Making growth pay for itself!

Search Results for: domain

The Real News on Water Treatment Plant #4: From the Comical to the Real Estatesman

When big news stories broke in the good old days, Austin citizens relied on their one daily paper to get the details.  Along came the Austin Chronicle as the new boss, the progressive alternative to challenge the old boss American-Statesman; a rivalry good for coverage of community issues.  But a while back, the new boss Austin Chronicle (despite the good sensibilities of its publisher Nick Barbaro) decided to be damn nearly the same as the old boss Austin American-Statesman, and kowtow to the real estate growth lobby.  Which maybe explains why some people call them the “Comical” and the “Real Estatesman”. 

This issue will be coming back in May 2010 for a vote of the Austin City Council.  So far, they are split 4 in favor (Leffingwell, Martinez, Cole and Shade) and 3 against (Spelman, Riley and Morrison). 

Get the story the Statesman and Chronicle failed to report, watch the debate yourself and YOU decide a major decision on Austin’s critical future on water policy!

Continue Reading

You can lead officials to millions, but…

..you can’t make ’em blink.

Brian Rodgers at the County Commissioners Court, July 16
Brian Rodgers at the County Commissioners Court, July 16

The Short Story
The Travis County Commissioners Court has so far refused to call for a full audit and to file a formal challenge to the under-valuations of commercial properties in Travis County. But some smaller taxing authorities (who, will remain anonymous at the moment) have contacted us and are preparing to go after the money they’ve been missing from the big developer boys. Meanwhile, the City of Austin just released its proposed budget and — guess what — it contains a property tax increase!

Continue Reading

Emancipating Pets, Patty Hearst and the Austin City Council

With hope and optimism ChangeAustin.org welcomes the newly sworn in Austin City Council. The past City Council, led by outgoing Mayor Will Wynn, appeared to suffer from a Patty Hearst syndrome (better known as Stockholm Syndrome). As captives of the real estate industry, their sympathy and identity with their captors began last year to catch the attention of voters from across Austin’s political spectrum when 129,209 of them voted for Prop 2 (to halt the Domain mall subsidy and others like it). Will the new Council, as it searches for $30 million in cuts to the City budget to fill the budget gap, snap out of it? We, at ChangeAustin.org, the eternal (albeit critical) optimists, sincerely hope so.

Did you attend any of the recent City budget “charettes”? If not, the City added an additional charette this coming Tuesday, 6:30 to 8:30 pm at the eastside’s Givens Recreation Center, at 3811 E. 12th St. We hope to see you there. Charette is just a fancy name for meetings in which the citizens attending are given a list of potential budget cuts selected by the City from which to discuss our support or opposition. The problem isn’t so much the process, but the pre-selected and sanitized list the participants are given. Decisions involving the real allocation of resources are well outside the margins of debate.

The list of budget cuts up for consideration includes things like libraries, youth programs, Emancipet’s great animal neutering program (which actually saves the City money), neighborhood parks, the Community Action Network which deals with a myriad of concerns making up Austin’s “safety net” programs and nearly a thousand more items in the budget for the “little people”. But it was the items not on the list that told the real story. The one that seems to be a favorite “missing in action” is the now notorious Domain shopping mall subsidy (part of Will Wynn’s “legacy), a nice chunk of change amounting to about $2 million this year!*

Citizens must get ready for a whole litany of smaller cuts unless this new Council breaks the Patty Hearst-like spell and serves Austinites like true populists. Just last week the outgoing Council passed, by 6 to 1 (with Morrison all by her lonesome) a low income housing deal that was a rich deal for the developer because it gave him a 100% property tax break and $3 million in cash. Even low income housing advocates were holding their nose on this one.

For years, Austin citizens and activists have been asking for more accountability at City Hall. When we didn’t get it, we petitioned for a vote. We won some and lost many, but we keep fighting on, sometimes wondering if we need our heads examined.

Is it possible that the fighting will soon come to a halt? While we caution you not to start singing Kum Ba Yah yet, we’re beginning to wonder. A piece we wrote two weeks ago entitled, “Charette or Charade” about the city’s citizen’s budget meetings, prompted the following response:

“Wait till the $2.3 billion Biomass plant deal hits – you ain’t seen nuttin’ yet!” Well neither have you seen “nuttin’ yet” from ordinary citizens who are clamoring for fairness. For example, there are 95,000 property tax challenges going on in Travis County right now!

Will a perfect storm arrive in Austin where citizens, not just activists, are ready to put their foot down? Maybe we won’t need to deprogram the City Council in memory of Patty Hearst, though it was probably jail time that snapped her out of it. Seriously, we’re here to help.

Contrary to what the recently departed Mayor Will Wynn said in those TV ads paid for by Simon Malls last year, the Domain deal was and still is a completely voluntary gift by the City to the developer.

City’s Citizen Budget Meetings: Charette or Charade?

Charette: a final, intensive effort to finish a project, esp. an architectural design project, before a deadline.

Charade: a blatant pretense or deception, esp. something so full of pretense as to be a travesty.

Last Tuesday’s first of three city citizen’s budget  meetings, held at the Northwest Recreational Center, set up as a “charette” was, presumably, to be a lesson in public participation about the realities of cutting a city budget.  After an overview of city revenues and expenditures by city budget officer Ed Van Eenoo, the 200 plus citizens in attendance, in groups of seven or eight to a table, voted on a sanitized list of some 30 budget cuts and revenue raising items.

As the first citizen to speak pointed out, the $2,000,000 annual payment to the Domain Shopping Mall was conspicuously absent, something they strongly objected to along with the 4th speaker.*  (We swear to you, we did not seed the attendees!).  One attendee had the idea of using funds saved by lowering the pay of the highest paid police force in the state (APD), to start the next cadet class.  But renegotiation of the police union contract was not on the table.

Meanwhile, the rest of us peons in Austin are related to like well… peons, being asked questions like, ‘Would you prefer to cut libraries or charging people to get in to the Trail of Lights’!

In all fairness the City is doing some things right.  The City Manager added an item to this year’s budget reduction proposal (page 313) to increase various fees for the City’s review of the larger development projects.  It also creates a new category for smaller projects to more equitably distribute the fees among users.  The overall proposal would raise an additional $370,750 and is at least a start, albeit a modest one.  Bue it was KVUE’s story on June 3 that began to expose the 800 pound gorilla in the room — that some people (we wonder who) are projecting that the population of our metro area will double from 1.3 million to 2.7 million by 2025.  Who’s going to pay for this growth?  If nothing changes, it will continue to be us peons.

The short story on the City of Austin’s 2009-2010 Budget is this: the budget items selected for public scrutiny were limited to items m, n, o, and z.  Unfortunately for us, the rest of the alphabet soup covering the full width and breadth of the budget were off limits.

Is this process a charette or a charade? Perhaps it is both.  Our local “progressive” politics is becoming better known as Austin’s favorite pastime — confuse the voters.

If you want to participate and see for yourself, you might attend the second or third (and last) of these charades, uh, we mean charettes, this Monday or Tuesday (listed below).  We’d love to get your feedback on this page either now or after you attend one of the meetings.

Peon: a person held in servitude to work off debts or other obligations.

Peons unite!

Monday, June 15, 6:30-8:30 pm – Gus Garcia Recreation Center, 1201 E. Rundberg

Tuesday, June 16, 6:30-8:30 pm – Toney Burger Activity Center, 3200 Jones Road

Just in case you bought the Mayor’s TV ads last year opposing Prop 2 (paid for by the Mall’s developer, Simon Properties, the Real Estate Council of Austin and the Chamber of Commerce), the City’s contract with the Mall includes a clause Brian Rodgers, co-founder of ChangeAustin.org, won in court several years ago.  That clause allows the City to walk away from the deal anytime without penalty.

Endorsements! A Little Pandering please.

ChangeAustin.orgformerly Stop Domain Subsidies (Prop 2) in last November’s election, proudly endorses:

Carole Keeton Strayhorn for Mayor
Perla Cavazos, Place 1
Mike Martinez, Place 2
Bill Spelman, Place 5
Sam Osemene, Place 6

Watch the Videos on our front page:
Brian Rodgers video on why Carole.
Carole Acceptance video.
Brian on Places 1, 2, 5 & 6.

ChangeAustin.org is working to reach 30,000 voters before the election in May, just a portion of the 123,209 voters who supported Prop 2, to get them to the polls. 

Help us get the word out — contribute whatever you like!  Since CA.org is a registered PAC, we can accept as little or as much as you like — just no corporate or labor money.

To Pander = To cater to the lower tastes and desires of others or exploit their weaknesses.

We’ve been told that some opposing candidate camps are explaining our endorsements as for those “willing to pander” to us.  Is that because they see open government, fiscal prudence, and putting an end to the gravy train for special interests as “lower tastes and desires” of the people of this City?

Mark your calendars!  Pre-early voting day Party!!!  
Saturday, April 25, 6 to 10 pm, Victory Grill – E. 11th St.
Live music but of course!

Volunteer from home or our office!  Call us or  right away!

Pass this email on and get involved y’all.

Our Endorsement Process

ChangeAustin.org, formerly Stop Domain Subsidies (Prop 2) in last November’s election, just began a week long voting process for endorsements in the City Council and Mayoral election in May.  The process is being done online after members view videos of the candidates answering ChangeAustin.org questions crucial to the City moving forward during the economic downturn.  Those questions include transparency and open government concerns and the bill introduced by Senator Jeff Wentworth (SB 690) to help local developers to snuff out the citizen’s charter amendment process used to get Prop 2 on the ballot.

Watch the Candidates on video here and get ready for our endorsement on Thursday, April 2.